Killingworth, Connecticut 06419
The Democratic Eye 2005
|
December 27, 2005 At this time of year, as we reflect on what we value most, it is especially surprising to hear a discordant voice promoting private development over a proposed land purchase intended for the public good. In a recent guest column in a local paper, that voice accused Killingworth of being "frightened of children". Nothing could be further from the truth. This town, and especially our new Administration, is not afraid of children. What we are afraid of is being unable to provide those children with all that they deserve - now and for the future. Killingworth's commitment to the well being of our younger residents is clearly supported by local facts, not out-of-state studies. Year after year we dedicate more than 77% of our taxes to their education. We willingly approved a bond issue for a much-needed new school. We produce volunteers who donate their time, equipment and expertise to build playing fields, and other volunteers who leave no stone unturned in an effort to plan for more. In fact, it was the Field Study Committee that recommended the Wettish property to the Board of Selectmen as an outstanding location where first-class fields could be constructed at a very reasonable cost. Killingworth's generous support of our children - longtime residents' and newcomers' alike - has helped make this town one of the fastest growing in Connecticut. Families want to live here because they know their children will be welcomed: by a school system dedicated to excellence; by enthusiastically supported sports programs; by a family-friendly library; by a proactive arts council; and, last but certainly not least, by a First Selectman who, in his forty-one years in Killingworth, was actively involved in educational and recreational programs for children, including the four he raised here. Many of our current, pressing problems are the result of a lack of long term planning. Marty Klein wants every family in Killingworth to be able to enjoy the quality of life his family enjoyed. But to accomplish that, he is acutely aware that we must plan accordingly. Clean water and clean air - for a healthy environment - is a legacy this Administration intends to leave this town. In recent years we have been remiss in our stewardship of what has been passed on to us. The essential concepts of stewardship and legacy are rooted in concern for our children and their children's children. The opportunities to protect that legacy, once lost, cannot be regained. December 6, 2005 Joe Courtney's hat is in the ring. He is a man with a mission, laying the ground work for success one determined step at a time. Joe is Democratic Candidate for the 2nd District Congressional seat now held by Rob Simmons. His introduction to the shoreline community was the main purpose of the Shoreline League of Democratic Women's November meeting. The SLDW views this event as the kick off to their year long "Forging a 2nd District Victory" grassroots campaign. The program began with a brief discussion of campaign strategy by Lon Seidman, who is co-president of the Connecticut Young Democrats. Seidman was followed by John Olsen, president of the Connecticut AFL-CIO. In his introduction of Courtney, Olsen called for a much needed change in Washington that would bring trust and honor back to national governance. .Courtney took up the gauntlet for change and outlined a program that challenges the direction in which both Congress and the present administration have been going. Among the core issues he addressed were fiscal responsibility, health care, energy, and the environment. The fact that this administration and Congress are out of step with their own constituency on most of these issues is a primary reason for change. That the 110th Congress, to be sworn in on 2007, must get its financial and fiscal house in order is paramount to Courtney's agenda. He views the growing deficit as " an unbelievable deterioration in our financial situation," and contrasts it to the surplus of 2000. The need to improve access to and quality of health care is one of the reasons Courtney is running for Congress. He sees a direct relationship between affordable, quality health care for everyone, economic advancement, and our ability to remain a just society. He believes that the present Medicare Part D Drug Plan should have been based on successful models that already exist, including our own state's. "If we have a Congress that really cares, we can get a better program." Courtney presents energy policy and the environment as closely related issues. "Everyone realizes there is technology out there to improve gas efficiency," that would not only reduce our reliance on foreign oil but improve our air quality. That is not the thrust of our present policy makers. An independent voice, representing his constituency in Congress, is what Joe Courtney is promising Connecticut's 2nd Congressional District. "It is time we had someone who understands constitutional responsibilities and the responsibilities a congressman has to those he represents." November 15, 2005 The campaign season is now over. The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee has come a long way from that cold January day at the Withington's to the mild Election Day of last week. In January we put together goals, committees, and the beginnings of a platform that would carry us into a rigorous campaign season. It has all culminated in a success that we will strive to make Killingworth's as much as our own. The ticket we offered the town was composed of dedicated and knowledgeable people of different ages and from different walks of life. Some of their faces have been part of the Killingworth scene for many decades, others have appeared more recently. But all share a commitment to preserving the best of our rural character while preparing for a well planned future. Working as a team often requires a concerted effort to keep one's eye on the prize. The prize in this case is nothing less than the opportunity to help Killingworth successfully manage its growing pains. As a diverse group of people with strong ideas, we have had our differences. But we pulled together when and where it counted and ran a campaign that stressed issues and not personalities. It is an honor to be Chair of the KDTC, and to be part of the joint efforts we have given in support of the entire Democratic ticket. From organizing early, to well timed mailings and political responses, we set the pace for the campaign. I congratulate all who won the office for which they ran, and encourage the others to stick with us and try again as we prepare for the years ahead. There will always be new challenges to meet and other election nights on which to savor the champagne. November 8, 2005 As the dog days of August wound down, Killingworth's political Town Committees geared up for the campaign season that culminates in Election Day. It is pretty much a local election this November, but that in no way diminishes its importance. The pundits are right, all politics is local. The foundations of our communities are built from the ground up. By mid September, political signs sprang into life along our roads and driveways, boldly replacing late summer blooms. Eventually, they would inspire a light hearted "sign pollution solution" that made its way into our mailboxes along with candidate brochures and letters. Recycle Way and Jensen's Beechwood Community became the "in" spots for candidates to introduce themselves to voters. Warmer- than- usual weather generally aided campaign efforts, eight days of rain and a nor'easter being noticeable exceptions. Three debates between selectmen candidates were moderated by the League of Women Voters. Two of them were taped by student John Ahearn of H/K High School and shown several times on Channel 18. The first in the debate series took place at the HK campus under the auspices of Chuck Lewis and proved a valuable civics lesson for the students. Not only did they supply the questions for the First Selectman candidates, Democrat Marty Klein and Republican John Amport, they were also the audience and the technicians for the video taping. The candidates and the Town Committees have worked hard to bring their platforms and themselves before the people of Killingworth. And, believe me, they would also get out and do the voting for every registered voter in town if the law allowed. But, of course, it doesn't. That is something we have to do for ourselves, our families and our town. In 2003, when Killingworth had its last municipal election, only 42.2% of registered voters got to the polls. That is a shameful statistic. The percentage for the 2004 Presidential election was 84.6% . Surely our town's future direction and prosperity impact our lives in ways as significant as our nation's. Let your voice be heard in the debate over Killingworth's future. Get to the polls on November 8th and cast your well considered vote. It is the right thing to do. October 25, 2005 The qualifications for Board of Education members are that you be a resident of Killingworth and a registered voter. You don't have to have children in the school system. A third requirement might be listed as "a caring and concern for the education of the children of Regional District 17." BOE members attend one general meeting a month. All Board and subcommittee meetings are open to the public. Members are on at least one sub-committee depending on where their interests and expertise lie. The School Board selects, works with, and evaluates the superintendent. It serves as an advocate for children, teachers and other staff by adopting "kids first" goals, policies, and budgets, while maintaining its fiscal responsibility to the community. The Board and the superintendent, working together, can create an atmosphere in which the vision of a school district leads to strong learning, healthy development and stimulating new concepts that challenge and excite children at every level of ability. Strong linkages with social services, health and other community organizations help to create an outstanding school system. This is further enhanced with well established interaction with the Board of Selectmen, and the Board of Finance. What could be better than being involved in a volunteer public service that is helping children achieve their highest potential in preparation for their life as an adult? This is what Democratic candidate for Board of Ed, Mary Withington, is looking forward to doing when she becomes a member of the Regional District 17 BOE. Mary Withington, and her husband, Tim , moved to Killingworth because they felt Region 17 schools provided excellent educational opportunities for their two children. As a homeowner and a parent, Mary understands the pressure of community concerns overall but has often stated that the education of Killingworth's children must be of a quality to prepare them for the demands of the 21st century. She will come to the Board well prepared . Mary worked in the Human Resources Department of a large company. She taught medical assistance programs to students working with doctors. She also wrote a program on policy procedure which was reviewed for accreditation. This policy was named one of the top technical programs of its kind in the country. The critical thinking skills and the ability to work positively and effectively with others that Mary has developed throughout her career are a perfect fit for the Superintendent's emphasis on open communication and the development of positive relationships. What better decision could you make than to vote for Mary Withington for the Board of Education on November 8th? October 18, 2005 The upcoming election is approaching rapidly and campaigning has begun in earnest on both sides. It is evident and pleasantly surprising that the espoused goals of the Killingworth Republican Town Committee are eerily similar to those already put forth by the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee. It would seem that after several years of contention and rancor we, as a community, have finally come to consensus on the problems our town faces. Surely this is to the benefit of all the residents of Killingworth. Obviously the choice for the voter on Election Day is which ticket will deliver on their promise to resolve our problems and show some much needed leadership in defining our future. It is no surprise that both parties claim to be the right choice for the task at hand. It needs to be pointed out that today's problems were yesterday's future. Newer residents may not know that the Republican Party has held the reins of power in our town for the last 16 years. When one considers where we are it is to be expected that the current Republican campaign has made a concerted effort to separate itself from the current administration. They are wise to do so. Hopefully this is more than political expediency on their part. Hopefully they have learned from their past errors and are sincere in their efforts to correct them. When they promise government that is open, timely and responsible they know that government in this town has not been these things in recent years. When they promise fiscal responsibility they know, too, that much taxpayer money has been squandered on grandiose projects that were not viable. When they promise "real involvement in the RSD #17 budget process" they are saying that it has not been so in the past 16 years. When they say that the encouragement of volunteerism is one of their major priorities they know that committee findings and recommendations representing hundreds of hours of work have been falling on the deaf ears of the administration that appointed them. Finally, when they say, as they must, that they possess the required vision, experience and leadership, it is to be hoped that their promises are based on a new beginning for the Republican Party in Killingworth. If, indeed, we as citizens of this community are truly concerned about this town, about education, about preserving our rural character and, yes, about taxes, then a new awareness on the part of the Republican Party is to be applauded. If saving Killingworth from the errors of the past is our common goal then the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee welcomes the town's Republican Party as partners in that enterprise. Let us hope that the real winner on November 8 is Killingworth. October 11, 2005 Killingworth's Board of Finance consists of six elected members who serve staggered four-year terms. Their primary mission is to finalize the annual budget, monitor the town's expenditures, and develop responsible and proactive long-term spending patterns. The most challenging part of this mission is the preparation and finalization of the annual budget. Once the Board of Finance finishes their budget assessment, they hold the public Annual Budget Meeting, usually in late May. The proposed budget is explained line by line and community input invited. The Board then considers the comments and finalizes the budget for a town vote. Detailed information of the budget, including reports from commissions and boards, is then published in the town's Annual Report. This November, three Democratic candidates are running for the Board of Finance. They are Gwenne Lally, Arlene Tunney, and Tim Withington. All three have served Killingworth in a number of capacities and are eager to assume their responsibilities as members of the Board. Gwenne Lally has been involved in town endeavors since her arrival a few years ago. She has a Masters in Information Science from Penn State and has been a Senior Vice President for several marketing firms. In Killingworth, Gwenne has served as Vice Chair of both the Conservation Commission and the Field Study Commission and as Secretary of the Town Office Building Study Committee. Gwenne brings years of computer and management skills to the table. Her management style is collaborative and her business experience has always involved concern for the bottom line. Arlene Tunney has been a Killingworth resident for 24 years. She has served in an elected position on the Zoning Board of Appeals and is a past Director of the Ambulance Association. She is a Charter Member of both the Killingworth Chamber of Commerce and the Killingworth Creative Arts Council. Arlene has been in her own business since 1973. She is thoroughly familiar with payroll taxes, pensions and office equipment and has helped clients prepare budgets for building projects ranging from $10,000 to $10,000,000. Tim Withington, like Gwenne Lally, is a newer resident of Killingworth. He, too, has wasted no time in actively joining our community's life. Tim serves as Deputy Director of Emergency Management, and Local Emergency Planning Commissioner. He is part of the Public Health Agency and is on our Land Use Committee. Withington's background in medical emergency preparedness and management, and supervision of clinical data systems requires attention to detail and accuracy. Tim will come to the Board of Finance with strong communication skills and scrupulous attention to detail. The Board of Finance and the town of Killingworth will be well served by all three candidates. October 4, 2005 The crucial need for common sense, good planning, and competence on every level of government has been brought home to all of us over the past month via our TV screens. As Killingworth prepares to elect its town officials, we are being offered opportunities to hear our candidates for First Selectman and Selectmen over the next few weeks. This is our chance to get to know them better, to let them know our concerns for Killingworth's future, and to make wise choices on Election Day . The first event was an informal address at the Killingworth Seniors' Center by candidates for First Selectman and Selectman. The discussion took place on October 3 at 2:00 during the Seniors' regular meeting at the Congregational Church. The second meeting will take place at the Haddam Killingworth High School Auditorium on October 6th from 12:30 to 2:00 under the auspices of HK's Chuck Lewis. It will be moderated by the League of Women Voters. This will be a more formal debate between the First Selectman candidates, John Amport and Marty Klein. There will be questions from high school seniors and the public is invited to attend. It will be televised and we will all be able to catch it over the next few weeks on Channel 18. A serendipitous sidebar to this particular debate is the involvement of young voters in the formalities of political campaigns and the political process, Civics in action. Elise Low, President of the East Shore League of Women Voters, headquartered in Guilford, is moderating the debates. The League of Women Voters is a non- partisan political organization that seeks to improve government through citizen education and advocacy. It neither opposes nor supports any particular candidate but concentrates on making the democratic process work for the citizenry. A roundtable discussion between the three candidates for selectmen, Fred Dudek, Steve Hollander, and Ed Sipples on October 20th at the Congregational Church in Killingworth should be lively and informative. Town folk are invited to attend the discussion which will begin at 8:00pm. On Tuesday, October 25th , again under the auspices of the League of Women Voters, the First Selectman candidates, John Amport and Marty Klein, will debate each other in the Clubhouse at Jensen's Beechwood Community. The debate will begin at 7:00 and is open to Beechwood residents only. The intricacies of scheduling such discussions are many and varied. Michael J. Sanders, Chairman of the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee, and John Amport, Chairman of the Killingworth Republican Town Committee, worked diligently to make the schedules work for everyone. That was the hard part. We just have to show up and, of course, to vote on Election Day, November 8th . September 27, 2005 Over the past few weeks we've been seeing coverage of hurricane Katrina 24/7. We keep hearing that we are neither immune from disaster nor prepared for it. We're repeatedly warned how dependent we are on local government and how slowly and clumsily help can be in coming from Washington. Over and over, but maybe still not often enough, we're reminded that those who have the least and need the most are the most likely, in their desperation, to get the least of what they need. The failure was not that nobody knew what might happen. In 2002, the New Orleans Times Picayune published a five-part series that essentially predicted Katrina's aftermath, from breached levees to 20,000 evacuees sheltered in the Superdome. They cited detailed projections made by computer models developed at Louisiana State University and other institutions that described what would happen if water flowed over the levees or if the levees failed. The failure was not that nobody planned for the worst. In July 2004, more than 40 federal, state, local and volunteer organizations carried out a five-day exercise dubbed "Hurricane Pam" where they responded to an imaginary storm that destroyed over half a million buildings in New Orleans and forced the evacuation of a million residents. After the fact, we have seen an overwhelming outpouring of compassion from across the country and around the world. But the fundamental failure is that until Katrina hit, few of us cared what might - what inevitably would - happen in New Orleans. If we'd cared, we would never have allowed one of our loveliest cities to be crippled by grinding poverty. If we'd cared we would not have allowed the administration to whittle away at funding for emergency management year after year while they spoon-fed tax cuts to the rich. If we'd cared we might have applied pressure to preserve FEMA's effectiveness instead of sacrificing it to that post 9/11 political showpiece: the Department of Homeland Security. If we'd cared about the social toxins that have polluted the lives of New Orleans' poor, largely African-American residents for generations, we might not now be shocked by the sight of their bodies struggling through - or floating in - streets filled with toxic water. Eventually the intensive coverage will fade. Other stories will dominate the news. But we will still be living with Katrina, 24/7. Because every hour of every day there are Americans we care about as little as we cared about the victims of our indifference who became the victims of Katrina. They're in our cities, our suburbs, our countryside - and even our town. They're people whose daily struggles are invisible to us - even when we pass them on the street. In the face of escalating taxes and home prices, some Killingworth residents are in danger of being marginalized or even forced out of town -particularly the young people who add vitality to the community and step up to fill the dwindling ranks of our volunteer fire and ambulance services, and our older, long-term residents. And while their difficulties lack the intense drama of hurricane evacuees, they are no less important. The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee is committed to help all our residents. Our elected officials and volunteers will work to provide for the housing and other needs of these valuable citizens while accommodating the desires of the entire community for a well-maintained infrastructure, a well-funded library, athletic fields and other recreation facilities, open space and social services in a fiscally responsible manner. And we'll do it 24/7. September 20, 2005 As the need for political participation on all levels of government becomes more evident in our complex society, a new organization has taken form to enhance the role of women in the political process. The Shoreline League of Democratic Women (SLDW) swore in its first slate of officers at the Clinton Library on September 7th. Over a hundred and forty people, all ages and both sexes, gathered to witness the event and meet some of our elected officials. Several State Representatives, including Brian O'Connor , were there to meet and greet and discuss issues with constituents. State Comptroller Nancy Wyman, State Treasurer Denise Napier, and Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz also moved among those assembled, receiving warm greetings and an earful of what is on the minds of today's women. Secretary of State Bysiewicz, in her address to the audience, backed up her statement that Democratic women can make a difference. She explained that a voting analysis of the 2004 election indicated that if more Democratic single women had voted there would have been a different outcome. That would have made all the difference in the upcoming Supreme Court nominations. Nancy De Nardo, the leader of the State Democratic Party , in her address to the audience, emphasized the inclusiveness of "women's issues'. One of her core beliefs is that women bring a different perspective to power, one of great fairness, equity, and conciliation. Dynamic State Comptroller, Nancy Wyman, in advising women on how to get started in politics, said she began when she wanted to impeach her local Board of Education. Not able to do that, she did the next best thing and ran for the BOE . The rest is history. Wyman encourages women by telling them they are already doing it all, "We are very good multi-taskers." As for being State Comptroller, she asks bluntly, "Who balances the books at home?" Newly installed President, Belinda Jones, spoke directly to the need for leadership by women on the local, state, and national level. She referred to the startling statistic that the United States ranks 60th among nations in the percentage of women in government. We are behind Pakistan and Rwanda! In quoting a hero of hers, Lisa Sullivan, who chose to work among the street people of Washington , D.C., Jones stressed "We are the leaders we've been waiting for." The Shoreline League of Democratic Women is a chapter of the Connecticut Federation of Democratic Women. It includes Killingworth, Clinton, Madison, and Guilford , as well as nine other shoreline towns. Its main objectives are: to unite women to support and advance the principles of the Democratic Party; to encourage growth of a well-informed electorate; and to promote full participation of women in every level of the Democratic Party structure. SLDW will hold meetings on the first Wednesday of the month from September through May, excluding December. For more information about the organization , President Belinda Jones can be contacted at 860 399 1147, and Vice President Laurie Santos at 860 669 8395. A website will soon be launched. Democratic women thinking about becoming more involved in politics and/or running for office may find this a supportive place to start. September 13, 2005 Did you see the beautiful 9 Town Transit bus at the Killingworth Town Picnic, the bus with the turquoise and blue ripples painted on its side? It's not a bad idea to inquire about how the services offered by the Estuary Transit District (ETD) may meet your needs. You may want to think twice about buying that jalopy for your teenager, or take the bus to visit your mother while your car is being repaired, or keep a doctor's appointment when you are unable to drive. You may even save commuting time and money by using the bus to connect with the Shoreline East. The Estuary Transit District, with its fleet of 9 Town Transit buses, offers public transportation service for everyone in the towns of Clinton, Chester, Deep River, Essex, Killingworth, Lyme, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook and Westbrook. The Shoreline Shuttle offers regular service along Route 1 from Old Saybrook through Clinton and into Madison, Monday through Saturday from 6:30 am to 6:00 pm. Every bus is wheelchair accessible and equipped with easy to use bicycle racks. Buses pass through town as many as 24 times a day . Stops include Post Office Square and Clinton Crossings as well as Hammonasset, and the center of Madison. Also included are the Tanger Outlets in Westbrook, and the train station in Old Saybrook. The buses may be flagged down and boarded anywhere along the route. Free transfers into New Haven via the CTTRANSIT route are available from Madison and at the Old Saybrook Train station. The 9 Town Transit Services are available to everybody regardless of age or ability. This includes both the Off-Route and Transit-On-Call services. The regular fare is $2.50, with a senior fare (60 and over) of $1.25. Transfers are free, as are children aged 4 or younger. The transfers are good for continuing a one- way trip. James Rode, ETD Administrator, explained that the 9 Town Transit system is funded through the State Department of Transportation and is supported by federal, state and local money. Its purpose is to give more people mobility and an option for transportation. In spending the day with a bus and his family at the Killingworth Town Picnic, Rode worked to raise awareness of ETD's services in our own town. Transit-on-Call services may be of particular interest to Killingworth residents where regular route services are not available. "Residents may schedule transportation from their homes to anywhere within the nine town Estuary region. Buses operate Monday through Friday and reservations can be made 1 week in advance and must be received at least the day before. Same day Transit-on-Call pick up is not available." Informational flyers are on hand at Town Hall, the Library, and the Killingworth Senior Center. Additional information may be obtained by calling Jim Rode at 395-0891 or visiting the website at www.estuarytransit.org. With rising gasoline costs, it is becoming more economical to use the 9 Town Transit System It may also be less stressful, certainly reduces pollution, and may even result in making new friends. To paraphrase an old song, "Take the bus, Gus!" September 6, 2005 Most of us have heard of Vista (Volunteers in Service to America), the organization that has put over 120,000 Americans in positions of national service since its inception in 1965. We know it as a home- based version of the Peace Corps, created as part of President John F. Kennedy's demand that we ask not what our country could do for us but what we could do for it. Vista's mission was and remains, to place volunteers in community-based agencies that are seeking effective, long term solutions to problems stemming from rural and urban poverty. Less well known perhaps is ACDI/VOCA , a 1997 merger of Agricultural Cooperative Development International and Volunteers in Overseas Cooperative Assistance. This organization, as configured today, addresses, worldwide, problems related to the development of commercial enterprises, agribusiness systems, community and financial services. The International Executive Service Corps was founded in 1964 under the auspices of David Rockefeller. It is a private not for profit organization that uses volunteers from the private sector to assist and promote economic growth around the world. It provides technical assistance in developing production and management skills from the Caribbean to Eurasia. All of these organizations have been the focus of the expertise and innovative skills that Marty Klein brings to whatever he does. From time with the International Executive Service Corps in 1970, to a stint with the Peace Corps in Tunisia in 1989, Klein has learned to deal with the specific problems at hand, listening to local people and providing technical and management advise suitable to their unique situations. Marty Klein has been a member of ACDI/VOCA since 1992 and Vista since 1993. Most recently, he has taught poultry farmers to use modern techniques of immunization, production, and marketing in Poland, Estonia and Kazakhstan. As a Vista voluneer, he has been the Community Gardens Coordinator for the Knox Parks Foundation in Hartford. The Foundation establishes and maintains community gardens in low income neighborhoods to help poor people raise food. In this context, he worked to restore solar greenhouses in the city . These greenhouses enabled gardeners to start vegetables from seeds. They also served as a science resource for area schools, providing students with a facility for learning seed germination and gardening skills. While donating his expertise to these worthy causes, Marty also owns and manages a popular golf range, is a management consultant on finances, personnel, and marketing, and a general contractor for home renovations and building inspection. Looking at the whole picture and believing that problems are solvable if you engage the people concerned, enables Marty Klein to bring success to these myriad and diverse activities. He believes that "We must be proactive and not reactive. Don't sit there and say it can't be done. And if you try something and it doesn't work, well, try something else." Bringing the community of Killingworth together to openly debate what it wants and needs for its future, and working on getting those things done, is the only reason Marty Klein is running to be Killingworth's First Selectman. August 30, 2005 The uniqueness of next Monday's holiday lies not in parades or picnics, or in the unofficial end to summer and the return of our children to school. It is, quite simply, the one day set aside to honor the men and women who built this country and helped it achieve a prosperity and a middle class not dreamed about over most of the earth or for most of human history. The holiday began in New York City on September 5, 1882 under the auspices of the city's Central Labor Union. By June of 1894 Labor Day was given national authenticity when Congress extended observance of the holiday to the District of Columbia and the Territories. But even as workers enjoyed their holiday and their recognition, they usually worked under conditions most of us have forgotten ever existed. There were few if any child labor laws, no minimum wage laws, no workplace safety laws, and in many places, no basic hygiene facilities. Ten and twelve hour days and six day weeks were the norm. Job security and pensions were a part of no one's vocabulary. Women were relegated to a few job categories and most people could expect little or no advancement over their working lives. Employment benefits might mean you could live in a stable at the back of a shop if you were single, or you could take home a stale loaf of bread after ten hours in a bakery kitchen. Conditions relied solely on the temperament of the employer. Early labor leaders faced ostracism, beatings, jail, and sometimes death. But gradually, at great sacrifice to themselves and their families, they made progress. In one of the worst economic decades of the twentieth century, the 1930s, labor continued to push for decent wages and working conditions .With an irony lost on few Americans, it was a president born with the proverbial silver spoon in his mouth, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who provided American labor with the platform to make progress. And this was done even as America was on the verge of a World War that would see its labor force produce the greatest volume of war materials ever assembled. The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 guaranteed the right of the worker to join unions without fear of managerial reprisals. It created the National Labor Relations Board to enforce that right and to prohibit employers from committing unfair labor practices that might discourage organizing or prevent workers from negotiating a union contract. Out of those negotiations grew fair wages, safety nets like workmen's compensation and unemployment insurance, pensions and health benefits. Workers were able to keep their children in school, even send them to college. The middle class grew as did the nation's prosperity. None of this should be taken for granted. Just as it was slowly and carefully built, it can be dismantled, one program at a time. Democrat, Liberal, Republican, we enjoy a standard of living today that was built on the sweat of the working man and woman of yesterday. Their courage to insist on a fair wage and decent working conditions made all of our lives better whether or not we ever belonged to a union. We should not forget where we came from and who got us where we are. Sophocles summed it up perfectly long ago, "Without labor, nothing prospers." Happy Labor Day, America. (Celebrate the spirit of Labor Day by participating in our political process and have fun at the same time. You can meet many of the Democratic candidates at the Killingworth Town Picnic on September 4, at Deer Lake.) August 23, 2005 A remarkable event took place on August 13th within the shaded protection of Sheldon Park's pavilion. Undaunted by 94 degree heat and matching humidity, the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee reached another of the milestones it had laid out under the direction of its Chairman, Michael Sanders, at last January's seminal meeting. Democratic candidates for the November 8th election were gathered together under the auspices of the KDTC Nominating and Communications Subcommittees to discuss strategies. In his introductory remarks, moderator Ed Sipples thanked the candidates for stepping forward and for finding the time among their many responsibilities to run for public office . He then laid out the objectives of the meeting. "First, we are here to meet one another face to face and recognize ourselves as a team. Next, we will address what you can expect the KDTC to do to help you in your campaign efforts and also in your coming term in office. Last, we will address what you need to do to help us help you." This serious meeting had its amusing side as candidates duded up to have their pictures taken by professional photographer, Amy Etra. Shirts with buttoned down collars were put on in cars and behind trees, ties fixed, jackets gingerly added at the last minute . Amy was undaunted as she mopped brows, powdered shiny chins, and used her considerable talent to make everyone look good. Pictures taken, jackets and ties came off with none of the finesse with which they had been put on. The serious stuff included a Campaign Information form, designed and handed out by Jamie Young and the Campaign Directory which Jamie also explained. Chairman Mike Sanders, and Gwenne Lally, Chair of the Communications Subcommittee, then discussed the Democratic Platform and the importance of being on message. Reggie Sipples, KDTC Treasurer, outlined the ins and outs of campaign financing. She distributed a handout to remind candidates of how much can be donated and how those donations should be processed. Brian O'Connor, our State Representative, discussed effective campaign techniques, salting his narrative with his own experiences. Brian is a firm believer in meeting the voters face to face and getting to understand their genuine concerns. He has learned that it is essential to take nothing for granted during a campaign season. "Good government is government that is responsive to the people and involves them in the process," was part of First Selectman candidate Marty Klein's advice on campaigning. "People have interests that have to be listened to," he emphasized as he advocated door to door campaigning. Three and a half hours after it had begun, Mike Sanders thanked the presenters, photographer Amy Etra, and all those who had attended. He closed the event with the brief summation, "This is a campaign of ideas, intelligence and cohesion." So, as the dog days of August begin to slip away, the campaign season is set to arrive in earnest on a more invigorating September breeze. (Meet many of the Democratic candidates at the Killingworth Town Picnic on September 4, at Deer Lake.) August 16, 2005 Connecticut's property owners have been learning some hard lessons lately, and paying a high price for it. Just ask those featured in Marcia Chambers' Hartford Courant article on recent trends in town assessment and revaluation ["A Shocking Assessment", August 8, 2005]. Their only crime is the location of their modest homes - near or at least with a seasonal view of some water. To the private companies our towns increasingly rely on to perform reassessments, that technicality can transform a small bungalow into the equivalent of a mansion, doubling or tripling taxes in a single year. And the towns do need the money, because Connecticut's over-reliance on property taxes to fund education unfairly penalizes locations with attractive views, even if the people looking out at them are far from wealthy. Killingworth may not be burdened by vistas of Long Island Sound, but we are under the same kind of pressure. Most of our homes are dangerously vulnerable to the "C" factor - a multiplier that ratchets up a property's value based on the "condition" of its view. The most obvious is a large expanse of water, but woods, ponds, streams and horse pastures qualify too. And, with the rural ambience of Killingworth attracting so many new residents who pay ever-higher prices to enjoy our unique lifestyle, the problem of the "C" factor is compounded by rising school costs. Every new home costs Killingworth money by requiring infrastructure and services - but most notably added school expenses. While estimates vary among studies one thing is certain: every new private home is a severe economic drain on a town. According to Jim Gibbons of UCONN and one of our NEMO partners, a typical Killingworth scenario of a family with one school-age student moving into a representative new home will result in a deficit of $1,415 per year. Worse, many of these families do not stay. Once their children have taken advantage of our school system, the parents move on - selling the house to another couple with children. And the drain continues. The problem is certainly not our children, it is the imbalance in the state's unequal and inadequate funding of our towns' educational costs. According to First Selectman Candidate Marty Klein, the Killingworth Democratic Party is concerned with this issue and prepared to address it. He points out that, while there are no easy answers, some things can be done. Close cooperation with our State Representative, Brian O'Connor, and State Senator, Ed Meyer is essential if we are to seek a more equitable formula for education funding, reduce reliance on property taxes, enhance accountability and distribute the economic burden more fairly. On a local level, whoever wins office this November must pursue a close, collegial, mutually cooperative relationship among Killingworth's Board of Selectmen, Haddam's Board of Selectmen and the District 17 Board of Education. Where there is the will and the commitment, a way can be found. August 2, 2005 Marty Klein has been unanimously chosen by the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee to be the First Selectman candidate for the Fall 2005 elections. Marty was chosen for his intelligence, work ethic, understanding of the needs of towns such as Killingworth and his impressive ability to see the big picture when its comes to governance and the need to handle complex issues. He moved to Killingworth with his wife Barbara and raised four children. All of their children attended K-12 schools in the Killingworth system. His commitment to a healthy and sound Killingworth is without question. For most of his life he has been involved in agriculture. He has successfully operated an agricultural business and developed and owned Klein's Gulf Range in Madison for 12 years. He has developed extensive business skills and has successfully managed a variety of projects. Marty's business and life experience have taught him the importance of long term strategic planning. This planning is crucial to preserve the vitality of our community in order to safeguard its future. One of Marty's greatest strengths is his ability to see beyond the moment. He knows that looking at Killingworth requires a lens that focuses down the road 10-20 years. If we plan for our children, we know that their moment will come when they are grown. How we educate and prepare them will greatly affect their future. How we plan for our town will greatly affect their future home. The questions facing Killingworth demand long-range vision and the ability to foresee the interrelated impact of a wide range of trends and developments. This Marty can do with skill and mastery. Not only will Marty's door always be open -- Marty will be there when you step through it. He will be a full time First Selectman. Our town's needs can be met by nothing less. On the national stage we are witnessing strident rhetoric and polarization at a time when our country is at a crossroad and we can least afford it. Killingworth is at a crossroad as well. We are on the cusp of changes that will determine whether or not we can keep our rural character while pursuing a course of measured growth in carefully planned increments. We must all pull together; one hand knowing what the other is doing, coordinating the work of our Boards and Commissions to do what is best for our environment, children, seniors and all our residents. In the future this election will be viewed as one critical in determining Killingworth's evolving identity. It is important for every citizen to become involved. The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee has developed a plan for the future of Killingworth, and Marty is ready and able to carry it forward. In the coming months he will be actively working to meet with as many of you as possible for an in-depth, one-on-one discussion about the issues that concern you and their solutions. On behalf of the Town Committee we urge you to engage in the political process and thank you for your taking part. July 26, 2005 An evolving process that began in the midst of winter has culminated in a slate of candidates unanimously endorsed at this month's regular KDTC meeting. On a sunny Saturday morning last January, members of the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee met at the home of Tim and Mary Withington to do some tough brainstorming, goal setting, and process analyzing. Discussions were honest and thorough, charts developed, and long term town needs assessed. John Lally, at what would sadly be his last meeting, summed up the broad collective aim of those assembled, "We want to be the group Killingworth looks to for competent, fiscally responsible leadership in preserving its rural character, while accommodating inevitable growth in carefully planned increments." To that end, under the Chairmanship of Michael Sanders, five subcommittees were formed, including a Platform Subcommittee and a Nominating Subcommittee. The Platform Subcommittee elected Rick Berzon as Chair. From the outset, the committee was open to suggestions and revisions which it solicited from the KDTC membership. Before the platform's final crafting, the committee presented a bare bones outline, followed by a full draft that incorporated comments, additions and revisions. At the heart of our platform is the commitment to bring to "Killingworth the thoughtful, intelligent, responsible stewardship that will guide it to a healthy future we can all enjoy." Among the issues addressed were planning for the future, managing growth, furthering education, revitalizing town government and controlling taxes, through the innovative pursuit of fresh ideas combined with an appreciation for the tried and true. The Nominating Subcommittee, under its Chairman, Ed Sipples, not only sought prospective candidates from the KDTC membership, but "Early on, we reached out to all potential candidates," Ed explained at this month's meeting. "We ran a series of articles and dedicated an Eye column to attracting people. We invited anyone interested in serving the Town in either an appointed or elected position to contact any of us." And people did step forward as possible candidates. In fact, there were more possible candidates for the top of the ticket than there were openings. An objective process was then developed to select the "best of the best..." It was a difficult process. "All the potential candidates had special and unique strengths to offer. We learned from many of their ideas, comments and suggestions." The end result of fourteen subcommittee meetings has been a full slate of candidates that were enthusiastically introduced by Sipples at the July 17th meeting. The slate, as presented, was unanimously endorsed by the KDTC members in attendance. The candidates were then presented at the Democratic Caucus held this Sunday in the Killingworth Library meeting room. The slate was unanimously accepted by voice vote and the next steps in the campaign process are being planned. The members of the KDTC have worked hard over the last seven months to clarify our vision of what Killingworth's future can be and the kind of planning required to get us there. We know it will take a hands on, full time First Selectman , one comfortable meeting the people of his town, to pull Killingworth's citizens together and into the process. Marty Klein is the candidate to do that. Our full slate will support his efforts while reaching out to others to get things done in the right way for the right reasons. You will read more about all of our candidates in future columns. As Arlene Tunney said at that long ago January meeting, "Killingworth is on the cusp of a major development and the issue is: Will it remain Killingworth or become suburbia?" We have arrived at a platform and a slate of candidates that will address the issues we must face if measured growth, preservation of our town's character, its environment and its intergenerational population are to be secured. July 19, 2005 Citizens of Killingworth, friends and neighbors, there is certainly a great deal going on in our town these days. There are committees to study this and committees to study that. But, it seems to me, the most studies by far comprise land use and ball fields. Land use for open space. Land use for ball fields. Land use for schools. Land use for developments, i.e. single house parcels or cluster housing and, of course, the economic and environmental impact of each and every one of them. After much thought and discussion with people on both sides of the fence, I decided to address the "Bosco" property. Why? For one thing I was among those Land Use people who walked the property the very first time to determine if it was feasible to buy it. We needed additional ball fields, tennis courts and passive recreation in addition to what was provided at Sheldon Field. Townspeople recognized that we were a growing community. However, our vision of recreation facilities in 1998-99 was certainly not on the large scale many would be seeking just a few years later. What really has me distressed is the decision recently made at a Selectmen's Meeting to turn down $180,000.00 of State grant money for an easement on the part of the Bosco land that abuts the state forest. How can we citizens of Killingworth accept an arbitrary decision by just two officials that would be better suited to a referendum? The Board of Selectmen had plenty of time to put their cards on the table. To some of us in town it looked like a quick switch from a previously declared stance. Our Town Charter states that a Special Town Meeting must be called for any expenditure over $10,000.00. The money in question is not an expenditure, so the requirement does not apply. Nonetheless, it is money we weren't given the opportunity to accept or refuse. The call of the original meeting to decide whether to buy "Bosco" specified buying the property as open space. Those who favor rejecting the grant, as I understand it, hang their hats on that. But the original referendum to buy the property passed because, after much discussion about the town needing ball fields, tennis courts and passive recreation as well as possible uses for the house and outbuildings, the question voted on did not specify open space. These additional uses had been envisioned by the Land Use commissions, i.e. Planning and Zoning, Inland Wetlands, Conservation and other interested parties when the entire site was first walked. These ideas were well publicized at the time. One objection to accepting the grant voiced at the recent Selectmen's meeting was fear of hunters roaming through the area from the adjoining State Forest. As I understand it, Killingworth would retain the right to regulate hunting on its property. I also see no reason why an agreement could not be reached with the State limiting hunting through a lottery system with permits being issued at the Town Office Building, as it has been regulated in the State Forest adjoining my land. Another objection that was raised was that we might need more acreage for the adjacent new school to meet the per-pupil State requirement as enrollment increases. Looking at the map of the site I still don't see why this objection can't be resolved. Someone else has suggested that we sell the house, barn and five acres to someone who would like to restore and live in an historic, 17th Century home. We could use the money realized from the sale for whatever project is needed at the site. That is an intriguing idea that could be pursued even if the grant were accepted. I'd hate to see that lovely homestead demolished. Therefore, for the reasons listed above, I contend that if the Board of Selectmen does not reconsider their action, we need to circulate a petition requesting another town meeting to revisit the issue at public referendum. Let the people decide whether or not they want to accept the grant after a clear discussion of the conditions attached to its acceptance. July 12, 2005 This past legislative session has been marked by significant changes, both in leadership and in style. Governor M. Jodi Rell has settled in at the Executive Branch, Lieutenant Governor Kevin Sullivan has made a seamless transition to his new position, Speaker of the House Jim Amann has skillfully led the House of Representatives, and Senate President Don Williams has ably managed the upper Chamber. All four are in new roles, but their collective experience and hard work has resonated throughout Connecticut and has allowed them to meet the challenges facing our State. These changes have brought a breath of fresh air to the process and have provided opportunities for legislative members to present new ideas and revisit old ones. For me, it has meant a chance to express my views to a greater degree and implement many of them after having been named Chairman of the Insurance and Real Estate Committee. It is an honor and a privilege to serve in this capacity and I look forward to continuing the responsibilities of Chairman next session. I continue to be excited about the prospect of making a difference, particularly in health insurance. One of our major initiatives was providing affordable and accessible health care. Businesses and their employees are finding it more and more difficult to purchase health insurance and our goal as a committee was to give them the tools to do so. Building upon the Municipal Employee Health Insurance Program (MEHIP), we allowed association group plans, which consist primarily of small businesses and non-profits, to act as a large group when purchasing health insurance. This will give small groups the necessary buying power when negotiating with HMO's and an expected savings in their premiums. Another aspect of this bill allows HMO's to tailor variable design plans to businesses. This flexibility offers employers the opportunity to provide health plans that work for them and their employees. With these measures as our foundation, the Insurance and Real Estate Committee will continue to explore ways to make health care more affordable for the citizens of Connecticut. Other areas where the State made great progress were in stem cell research, open space, and an increase in municipal aid. Our financial commitment to stem cell research will give our biotech companies and universities the boost they need to be world leaders and competitors in the global marketplace. As the face of manufacturing changes, we need to be proactive in fostering an economy that will sustain us for generations to come. Besides a strong economy, the people of Connecticut have come to expect a higher quality of life, especially those residing in the towns comprised in the 35th District. We have done our best to maintain this standard of living by allocating more dollars to the preservation of open space and increasing municipal aid. In addition, the legislature is embarking on a tax incidence study that will give us a better understanding of our tax structure and how it is impacting the people of Connecticut and its economy. In tandem with a greater emphasis on performance-based budgeting, we will be able to achieve an efficient and effective State government. We have accomplished much this session, but there is still much to do. With a new leadership team in place, greater cooperation between Governor Rell and the legislature and the strength and wisdom of the people, the future of Connecticut is bright. Together we can attain our hopes and dreams and I look forward to working with all of you in realizing them. (Brian J. O'Connor is the State Representative for the 35th District.) June 28, 2005 Unlike most nations, ours, in common with each of its citizens, celebrates birthdays. And well it should. With the July 4th, 1776 Declaration of Independence, America stepped out of the box and ahead of its time. Inspired, it declared that all men were created equal and endowed with the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, its signers basically meant "all propertied white men." Women were iffy, and slaves were considered property. But a funny thing happened on the way to the twenty first century. "All men" did become all of us. Tolerance and acceptance grew. Freedom and opportunity were let loose in the land. The country had laid down in its Declaration of Independence, and subsequent Constitution, a platform for equality, civil liberties and responsibilities that it would gradually grow into and honor. We are able to celebrate the occasion of our nation's birth because of the vision and commitment of some very extraordinary men. Well read in the histories and philosophies of their day, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, and their like, put their lives and fortunes on the line to establish a nation free of tyranny as they understood it. And they knew who to put in charge. George Washington was chosen as Commander of the Continental Army because the Continental Congress knew him as a man of character and high moral and physical courage. He did not disappoint. Washington led a rag tag army to a victory that historian, David McCullough, describes as part miracle, a victory that might have gone the other way on any number of occasions. David slew Goliath. Now we are Goliath with much to make us proud. But the price of maintaining our liberty will always be vigilance. There is a prowling intolerance loose in this land, angry rhetoric and posturing flooding our air waves, and a fiscal irresponsibility spilling out of Congress that jeopardizes our future. In honoring our national birthday, let's take stock of this past year with an eye toward preserving our unique heritage and a commitment to passing it on to our children's children. Albert Camus said that "Freedom is nothing but a chance to be better." We are not done being better. We never will be. So as we congratulate ourselves, let us also rise to the promise of our nation's birth, chose our leaders for their character and wisdom, and expect more of them and ourselves in the year ahead. Our vision should be farsighted and unobstructed, standing as we do on the shoulders of giants. Happy 229th Birthday, America! June 21, 2005 Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican or independent, we consider ourselves your Killingworth Democratic Town Committee. Yes, we want our candidates to win the offices they run for. But our reason is not to seize power. It's to share it, openly and honestly, so that Killingworth can regain control of its future. The past few years have been marked by choices that were difficult and often divisive. At times our Town saw its energies diverted and diminished by confusion and conflict. Our leadership lacked the transparent communication, cooperative spirit and common ground effective government requires. Our boards, commissions and committees operated under that shadow. They suffered, as did we all. The KDTC is here to serve our whole Town and, more importantly, to help make our Town whole again. Our goal is to focus energy on issues that are of urgent importance to everyone. To put forth and, when elected, take practical, concrete steps to address pressing concerns. Before we finalize our slate of candidates we developed a plan to do just that: Effective Leadership for a Well-Planned Future -- The 2005 Killingworth Democratic Town Committee Platform. Over the next few months you'll be reading more about it here and hearing more about it from the candidates we nominate. It is a cohesive message about how to manage growth, further education, revitalize Town government, include all our residents, and control taxes. Our platform is a plan, not an agenda. It puts forth ideas but allows for modification. It outlines concrete directions without dictating solutions. Most of all, it provides a framework for effective, coordinated Town action at a critical time in our history. The Killingworth Democratic Party is working for government that is open, honest, capable, accountable and responsive to all our citizens. Our goal is to provide strong, competent, fiscally responsible leadership. We acknowledge that growth will happen, but we believe that it can and must be managed to preserve the unique character of Killingworth. We are committed to good government that coordinates solid planning with effective management. With your support, we will bring Killingworth the responsible stewardship it needs for a healthy future we can all enjoy. June 14, 2005 It's so easy to get caught up in Killingworth's rural atmosphere and gentle pace that sometimes we overlook our own problems. For example, the exterior condition of the Killingworth Library was neglected for several years by this administration, despite the Town's commitment to maintain it. Now that the situation has been addressed there's a bigger issue. When a local tradesman does a good job for a local officeholder he might be awarded a contract to do work for the Town. If the price is low enough there's no need to bid it out or go through a lot of complicated paper work and procedures. It's just business as usual. The repainting of the library is a clear example. Apparently the estimate came in just under the $5,000 mark, at which point a bid would have been required. Unfortunately, with no specifications or bidding, the level of work may not have been adequate. This sort of thing can happen with neighbors, acquaintances and citizens who are well known and respected. On the face of it there may not seem to be much wrong with that. It helps get things done. But it's symptomatic of a disregard for the future that can hurt us in the long run. In the case of the library, work that was paid for with our tax dollars may have to be done -- and paid for -- again, sooner than expected. That's an added cost that can be measured in dollars and cents. When we avoid focusing on other problems we risk incurring other, sometimes much higher, costs. There are very real issues facing Killingworth that we need to plan for now, because even a little bit later might be too late. They go to the core of what our we value most about living here: the scenic countryside; our sense of community; the quality of our school system; the opportunities our location offers for work, culture and recreation; the manageable pace of life. The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee believes that every decision, big or small, must take future implications into account. In recent months we've been hard at work examining where we as a Town stand now and planning strategies that will bring us where we all want to be -- not just in 2005, but in 2015 and beyond. We're dedicated to providing strong, competent, fiscally responsible leadership that will address today's problems with a keen eye toward tomorrow. That means applying the same forward-thinking approach to all the Town's business -- from painting a library to painting a promising future for all our residents. June 7, 2005 Fellow citizens, are you unhappy at the thought of continuing tax increases but scared that economic development would erode our cherished rural atmosphere? Well folks, there is a way to tackle this problem if we follow the planning process put forward by Jim Gibbons -- U. Conn. Educator at the Extension Center in Haddam. He was speaking at the fourth meeting of the NEMO series coordinated by Conservation Commission Chairman Dave Gumbart on how today's citizens can address the inevitable growth in Killingworth. Jim Gibbon's prescription: Plan for Economic Development. He was talking PLANNING in capital letters. First step: take out the town map and study it. Become familiar with it; find the roads, then see where the developed areas are such as residential, town buildings, commercial areas, committed open space and regulated wetlands. Lands available for development are based on soil data, i.e.: the limitations and the suitability -- which lands are fragile, even where the public utilities are. In following this Resource Based Planning process we must study our Open Space Plan, the Economic Development Plan and review and possibly change land use plans, zoning regulations and town policies. Taking stock of schools and education was also included. Gibbons noted that studies have shown that single-family homes cost towns more in services than they pay in taxes. In contrast, commercial/industrial -- and, surprisingly, open space/agricultural -- parcels add almost sixty cents of every tax dollar to the town's bottom line. Thus a brief outline of a well illustrated two-hour talk. We are challenged to get started NOW to keep our beautiful town of Killingworth growing the way we want it. Gibbons' message about the importance of planning was well received by the many members of the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee who attended the presentation. In fact, a committee member had requested the Economic Development module, in large part because the KDTC believes informed, intelligent, proactive planning is essential for effective government. The issues facing Killingworth are simply too complex, and the pressures exerted from many different directions too strong, for us to react to events as they arise. The only way we can take control of our future is to plan for it. We must decide what kind of town we want to live in and develop a practical, workable plan that will make our goal a reality. Implementing some of the ideas put forward by Gibbons will help take us a step closer. May 31, 2005 History is a subject most of us leave behind when our formal education is over. We are left with an often vaguely remembered collage of names, dates and events that purportedly explain how we ended up in the present. It is from these individual remembrances that our collective identity is formed and, hopefully, passed on. Memorial Day weekend is a harbinger of summer and we look forward to warmer weather and the amiable sociability of outdoor gatherings with friends and neighbors. That somber holiday is more than a rite of passage to outdoor grilling. It, like most holidays, looks back in time. (Even Mother's Day marks a moment in history and honors the source of our individual beginnings.) The veterans who march in our parades are a living link to those who became part of our history before their times. So let's give history its due. As we recall an enjoyable weekend let's also reflect on the lessons of the past that it commemorates. The true worth of remembrance is not merely about yesterday and today, but tomorrow. Necessity may be the mother of invention but history has proven to be the mother of much necessity. Understanding our past enables the present and empowers the future. Recently we passed the school budget at referendum on the first vote. Who among us doesn't regard the quality of our children's education as a community priority? Like our other vital institutions, this country's educational system has undergone many changes and confronted many challenges. It does not only teach history. It has one. "No Child Left Behind" is a recent example that I find troublesome. It conjures up images of some deserted child left on a distant shore while the rest of us embark on a journey to some better place. The reality is that we are all in the same boat. The pursuit of higher test scores may placate the federal government and keep funding flowing but it is no guarantor of quality in our children's education. The truth is that test scores are an engine that dives quantitative results that have nothing to do with the quality of their future. The lessons of history can be harsh: we are responsible for our own future. Understanding the past and its mistakes teaches something that universal testing cannot -- how to think critically. History often debunks the fervor of a mythologized future filled with easy solutions and faith in science and technology. Tests don't teach, teachers do. We need to support the people who help mold our children intellectually as much, if not more, than the testing that merely classifies them. We have a new Superintendent for our school system and he is still on his honeymoon. I wish Mr. Mala well in his efforts to improve the quality of the education our children get. I am encouraged by his statements to date, especially concerning curriculum revision. I urge everyone concerned about education in this town to support him in his efforts to untether education from the anchor of testing. Perhaps then we can all set sail to a brighter horizon. May 24th, 2005 As Killingworth grows we all feel the pressure of development. Our larger population is making new and often costly demands on our community. The way we choose to respond to those demands will directly affect every one of us. This has sometimes transformed what began as considered, rational disagreement into heated controversy. It is particularly unfortunate that emotionally charged rhetoric clouded a number of recent discussions about how we as a town can best accommodate the needs of our children -- an issue everyone agrees is important. We may not all hold the same views, but sharing them in civil, tolerant discourse is the only way we will be able to shape our collective future. To further that goal, the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee has developed a program we call Eye-to-Eye. Eye-to-Eye is a series of meetings held at residents' homes and attended by their friends and neighbors -- Democrats, Republicans or independents -- where KDTC representatives and Democratic candidates for local office can hear the diverse opinions and individual concerns of a wide variety of townspeople. Each Eye-to-Eye is intended to be an informal, personal forum where residents can explore important issues facing Killingworth and have a frank conversation about the kind of town they want to live in. As such, every meeting is expected to be different, reflecting the particular concerns and perspectives of the individuals who attend. The first meeting, held on May 7 th turned out to be essentially about education. The KDTC is working for a town government that is open, honest, capable, accountable, and most of all, responsive. The more we can learn about the many different positions Killingworth residents take on a broad range of issues, the better we can serve you. We believe the time for a friendly conversation is long overdue. Eye-to-Eye is our way of getting it started. Everyone in Killingworth is urged to participate, regardless of party affiliation. If you would like to host an Eye-to-Eye or inquire about the next scheduled meeting, please contact us at KillingworthDems@hotmail.com or call Mike Sanders, Chair. May 17th , 2005 The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee has nominated Dr. Rick Berzon as their candidate to fill the Board of Education seat recently vacated by a resignation. Dr. Berzon brings both vision and experience to the table. He understands that the quality of a community's education directly impacts the quality of the community itself, and that the right education is vital to the future success of our children, our young people and our town's vitality. Active in the community since the day he arrived here some ten years ago, Rick's focus has consistently been on education. He has entrusted his own children to our schools. His daughter graduated from HKHS and currently attends Beloit College in Wisconsin; his son, Alex, is finishing the eighth grade at HKMS. Beginning with his service on the Facilities Study (Space Needs) Committee in 1997, and then as an elected member of the BOE in 2000, Rick has worked to ensure a first class education for our children and a supportive teaching environment for our educators. He currently serves as an appointed member of the Building Committee, and regularly attends BOE and school-related meetings. An early advocate for a new, free-standing middle school to accommodate the physical and emotional needs of our children and our teachers, he believes that small class sizes benefit both. Dr. Berzon will work to provide the resources required by the school system so that our children have the tools they need, including up-to-date textbooks, computers and related technologies. He sees this as a fundamental component in preparing them for an increasingly competitive world. From past experience on the Board, Berzon realizes that an ongoing dialogue with the community is crucial to future progress. Listening to the community's concerns and building consensus so that responsible decisions are made and responsible budgets are developed will be important elements of his approach to the demands of the position. In addition to bricks, mortar, and money issues, Rick states "There is no substitute for a progressive, challenging curriculum if test scores are to be improved and students are to be well prepared for the 21 century. I understand that attracting and retaining excellent teachers and administrators is a key variable in this effort." Clear in his own mind about why a good education matters, Dr. Berzon will bring qualifications and expertise to the BOE that can only benefit its performance. He has a 10-year history in the community and is familiar with the issues that are currently on the Board's plate; he is committed to improving the relationship between the town and the district; he has a track record of involvement with educational issues within the community; he is energetic and focused; and he can work with all the groups that make up this diverse community. Madeleine Albright in a recent speech at Southern Connecticut State University said, "History is a race between catastrophe and the right kind of education." Dr. Berzon's commitment to education reflects the seriousness of our former Secretary of State's remark. And that proven commitment is why we enthusiastically endorse him for the BOE seat. You can hear Rick speak for himself at the special Town Meeting on Monday, June 6th at 8:00 PM in the all purpose room at KES. The election to fill the Board of Education vacancy will take place at that meeting. May 10th , 2005 Our desire to maintain the rural character of Killingworth is aided and, in part, shaped by the fact that much of the area serves as watershed acreage for two public water suppliers. The South Central Regional Water Authority (RWA) is a quasi-governmental non profit agency that was created by the State Legislature in 1980 for the sole purpose of acquiring the New Haven Water Company which included over 25,000 acres of land in sixteen towns. Is has its own police force and serves 400,000 people in 12 cities and towns in the New Haven area. RWA owns the Hammonasset Reservoir which lies in the Hammonasset River Basin and straddles the Killingworth-Madison line. It has a surface area of 377 acres. Its water flows by gravity through a manmade tunnel ( bored through bedrock in the early 1950s) into the 14 billion gallon capacity Lake Galliard in North Branford. The RWA owns and protects over 1400 acres of its 5800 acres of watershed primarily along western Killingworth north of its reservoir. The Authority has adopted a "protect the source" program and protected over 500 acres in Killingworth since 1996. The Connecticut Water Company (CWC) is a publicly traded corporation that serves 237,000 people in 36 Connecticut towns. Its Killingworth Reservoir lies in the Menunketesuck River Basin. CWC is presently in the process of building a bigger dam to significantly increase its impoundment capacity. Its watershed either flows into the Killingworth Reservoir or into the Menunketesuck River which then flows into the Kelseytown Reservoir and treatment plant in Clinton. The CWC system supplies water along the shoreline from Guilford to Old Saybrook and north to Chester. CWC owns over 1200 acres of its nearly 6,000 acres of watershed along the eastern and southeastern side of Killingworth. By definition, a watershed is land that drains down slope to the lowest point. Water moves through a network of drainage pathways both underground and on the surface. These pathways meander into streams and rivers that continually move the water down stream, eventually reaching an estuary or ocean. It is the interconnectedness of this drainage system that makes it necessary for those living in such a region to work together to ensure its integrity. Any activity that affects the water quality, quantity or rate of movement will affect reservoirs along the way. Those ramifications become considerations for Killingworth's land use commissions and of course, the water companies themselves. While Killingworth's land use agencies do not have specific controls dealing with watershed areas, the simple fact that the wetland and watercourses are present requires existing regulations to automatically protect those source areas. In addition to our own enforcement officers, professionals from water companies advise on and review activities in their respective watershed areas. Inevitably such regulations and required easements get in the way of the plans of men. Nevertheless, even inadvertently, they do protect the character of the town and afford us recreational activities. With 12 % of Killingworth owned by the water companies and half of the Town's area within their watersheds, development has its limitations. There are large tracts of Killingworth that will always be open space. It is what we do with the rest of the acreage that will determine what we look like twenty years from now. It will take a shared vision, timely planning, and effective Town leadership to formulate a future that builds on what is best about us today. May 3, 2005 The best of what Killingworth represents will be on display this Saturday along Route 81 and Recycle Way. Volunteers will be raising money for the organizations and causes in which they ardently believe. From teens to seniors, people will be selling various treasures and goodies, exchanging ideas, and enjoying the satisfaction of being part of a community effort. The Library will be holding its Spring Book Sale, planned and run entirely by its volunteer force and some of our high school students. Proceeds will go directly to the support of the Library . And simultaneously, just up the road, several other activities will be in full bloom. The Historical Society, which carefully preserves our past to enrich our present, will be holding its Annual Spring Tag Sale. Along with unique finds and ordinary household items, it will be selling its new book, "A Photographic History of Killingworth", by volunteer Thomas Lentz. Close by, the Evergreen Garden Club Plant Sale will raise money for the Garden Club's Scholarship Fund. The Lions Club, whose community activities are well known throughout town, will be selling birdhouses this year. And the KDTC will be selling baked goods, KW bumper stickers and notecards to support its participation in the political process. Recycle Way may not be our town green most days, but that is what it will be on May 7th . And everyone working there will be a volunteer giving up a Saturday to be part of something larger then him or herself. Even as these events mark the Mother's Day weekend, our town Commissions and Boards are manned by volunteers who weekly give many hours to our vital concerns. Just how much time does the Board of Finance alone have to put into the compiling of a sound budget? How many hours does a volunteer firefighter give in the course of a year? Volunteerism is a bipartisan phenomena that cuts across age, gender, and political differences. It is also one of the reasons we should work to keep a diverse population through a wisely crafted affordable housing plan. Bill Clinton said , "Citizen service is the very American idea that we meet our challenges not as isolated individuals but as members of a true community, with all of us working together." An anonymous quote referring to volunteer pay reads simply "Volunteers are not paid, not because they are worthless, but because they are priceless." To the priceless volunteers of Killingworth, " Carry on!" May the sun shine on you this Saturday and the town turn out to support your efforts. April 19, 2005 In the troubled times in which we live, our military is in the news on a daily basis. As one drives through town , car after car passes with magnetic ribbons exhorting us to support our troops. Many of us have family or friends who are serving or have served in the current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Those who survive their deployment and return home will hold at least one thing in common forever: they will all become veterans. On February 16th, an expanded tax emption for qualified veterans was approved by a sparsely attended town meeting here in Killingworth. Income limits of $27,000 per year for individuals and $33,000 for couples under the Circuit Breaker Program would allow approximately 50 of Killingworth's estimated 450 veterans to qualify. A property tax exemption of $10,000 will return $248 to them under the current 24.8 mil rate, a token gesture but definitely a step in the right direction. The national steps seem to be very much in the wrong direction. The Veteran's Hospital in Rocky Hill has fallen into such disrepair that it is hardly habitable. In Washington, the current budget seeks cuts in proposed Veterans Administration funding. Veterans will be asked to pay an annual enrollment fee of $250 for treatment should this budget pass. Their pharmacy co-pays would increase from $7 to $15. In addition, every effort is being made under this administration to delay VA services to veterans by shunting them into private sector health providers. When do "the troops" become less deserving of our support? At what point does a society decide the debt is paid for the sacrifice of youth? This is an issue that begs an answer of conscience. How can we debate the death penalty or the Schiavo controversy and ignore the great moral and physical burden we place on those we send into combat? Who are these "troops" anyway? In our town , they are some 450 of your neighbors: someone's husband, or father, or brother, and increasingly someone's wife, or sister, or daughter. Many are your friends. They have helped weave the fabric of this community down through 350 odd years of history. They have also served as volunteer firemen and with the ambulance service. They have helped build the current recreation fields. They are the ones who spent lonely Christmases and Thanksgivings in far away places while others enjoyed the fruits of their sacrifice. While the new tax relief is a gesture, is it adequate? In recent years property values in our town have nearly tripled, a boon to many, a financial burden on those with fixed incomes, many of them veterans. Was there enough research into the veterans tax relief issue as brought before the Town Meeting? Newer state statutes allow for a more generous tax relief that would have included more of our veterans. Though, as with much legislation, the state does not reimburse townships for the cost. It is left up to us as a community to decide if we should be doing more for those veterans in need who have done so much for us. Let's keep an eye on the proposed cuts in veterans benefits emanating from Washington even as we continue to seek ways to increase benefits in our own state. You can buy lots of stamps for the price of a yellow ribbon. Use them to write your state officials, your congressman and your senators. The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee has been firmly behind creating an initiative to provide meaningful tax relief for our veterans. This is the most non-partisan of issues. We ask for increased awareness of veteran's concerns by the citizens of Killingworth. Let's be vigilant against future budget cuts by an administration in Washington seemingly forgetful of the returned soldier. April 5, 2005 A colleague's viewpoint regarding the delays in building a Middle School in Killingworth appeared in this column on March 22 and was titled "RSD 17 Middle School: getting involved". This was one point of view. I am writing to offer another. Like the original article, this also has not been reviewed or endorsed by the full KDTC. The logo the KDTC has chosen for its EYE Columns displays several eyes that symbolize multiple viewpoints. Democracy is based upon the free expression of conflicting views. In keeping with that principle, this is one of those times you are getting more than one "eye". In the early stages of the Middle School project, opposition was frequent and primarily focused on potential site problems. We have progressed passed this point. Three successful wells have been drilled and site work is commencing. Although the lawsuits from the neighbors have not formally been resolved in court, a preliminary attempt to halt construction has been denied. Progress is being made. In my opinion, the underlying reasons for the delays in getting the project under way are a result of mistakes the School Building Committee itself made. Consider the following: The initial referendum for $57 million in 2001 without a specific town or site was rejected by both Killingworth and Haddam causing a delay of almost two years. The School Building Committee was responsible for purchasing land in Killingworth without a proper A-2 survey and clear title that opened the door to the "vocal minority" and neighbor lawsuits that to date have not been completely resolved and have caused numerous delays. The School Building Committee and their agents failed to recognize that Killingworth Zoning regulations for schools require more useable land than they had purchased to support their maximum enrollment projections. This caused a major delay and the withdrawal of their application. Although a subsequent application for lower enrollment was granted by the P and Z, the School needs approximately 14 more useable acres to meet maximum enrollment compliance. These mistakes and others deserved questioning, challenges, and honest dissent. And that is what they got. I believe the final result of a process that undergoes the scrutiny and input from the people results in a better end product. I felt compelled to write this column on behalf of those citizens who saw these errors and stepped forward to voice their legitimate concerns. On the subject of referendums, I'd like to pose a question to RSD17 and Town of Killingworth officials. The current process involves the voters being asked to approve an overall CONCEPT for a specified amount of money. If approved, the next step is for specific engineering plans, P and Z and Wetlands etc. reviews to be performed. Why can't future referendum questions be worded in such a way as to authorize only the expenses related to this next step, rather than giving the applying group total authorization to spend the money in any way they see fit? A second referendum would be required, but the voters would then be able to approve a very specific plan rather than a generalized concept. By the way, I want this new Middle School in Killingworth to be built as soon as possible and like many others, am working to help the process. I believe we are past the point of no return and should be focusing on building the best school that $48.4 million will buy, a school that will be problem free for as long as possible. My suggestion about future referendums is a move to learn from the mistakes of the past to better serve the future. March 29, 2005 Congratulations, Killingworth. According to a recent issue of Connecticut Magazine, we're one of the state's top-rated towns. Scores for education, crime, economy, cost of living and leisure earned us the number ten spot in our population category. Killingworth residents like it here and it's nice to have our satisfaction confirmed by an outside, objective source. But some of the things that make Killingworth so desirable also reflect issues that we must address if we want to maintain the quality of life we all enjoy. First, and perhaps most urgent, is population. At 6,018 Killingworth is near the upper limit of its 3,500 to 6,500-resident group. If development continues unchecked, we will eventually reach between 9,000 and 10,000 - barely a small town at all. Our cost of living is already higher than many of us would like. Growth will drive it higher still by increasing demands on town services, the school system and our infrastructure. The Killingworth Democratic Party is acutely aware of the need to manage growth in carefully planned increments, accommodate future requirements and seek practical ways to preserve open space. According to the magazine, there is relatively little need in our community. That hardly comes as a surprise. The median house price of $319,000, second to only one other top-ten town in our class, makes it difficult for most, but not all, of those in need to live here. As Democrats, we believe one role of good government is to assure that even the most vulnerable among us have the basic necessities. There is another, more insidious side to our "wealthy" profile. The young people who were raised in this town and know its ins and outs cannot afford to buy homes here. They are often the citizens who step up to fill the dwindling ranks of our volunteer fire and ambulance services. Forced by economics to move out, they contribute elsewhere. Every year we are left with fewer of them to lend continuity and vibrancy to our community and its vital safety services. Finding a way to deal with this problem is a prime concern for Killingworth and a priority for the Democratic Party. The low crime rate, high mean SAT scores, and healthy per capita library expenditure reported by Connecticut Magazine are gratifying, but are they enough? Certainly we would all like our town to be even safer, our students more accomplished and our library better funded. To the extent that government can advance these goals, the Democratic Party will keep them on the agenda. Killingworth measures up by the magazine's parameters. But as the authors point out, "there are lots of reasons for loving a place - or not loving it - that go beyond the results you see here". Our town has its own special character - a uniquely rural personality in a conveniently suburban setting. We're not like surrounding towns and, in many ways, we don't want to be. It's up to each one of us to define what we value here, what we want to protect and preserve, what we want to change, and what we want to build. Those choices belong with the community. They must not be left to outsiders, to a vocal minority, or to chance. Make your choices known by participating in the local political process. Stay informed. Attend town meetings. Volunteer for a committee. And whatever your affiliation, please help the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee by sharing your thoughts and concerns. March 22, 2005 Over two years ago, on February 10, 2003, the voters of RSD 17 approved the "planning, design, acquisition and construction of a new intermediate/middle school," by a vote of 2,152 to 1,757. Since then, a variety of delays, including legal challenges, have prevented the project from moving forward in a timely manner. As of this writing, the project has now been delayed by over a year. The result of this delay is that we will get less of a school building for our money as the cost of building materials continues to rise. I am a member of the Building Committee as well as an RSD 17 parent and a Killingworth resident. Having lived in our town for 10 years, I did not expect that everyone would immediately come together and sing kumbayah once the project was approved by the voters. However, I did anticipate that when the smoke had cleared, the view of the majority of the RSD17 residents would prevail, and that the project would progress. The divisiveness that the new intermediate/middle school generates within the community - even now, subsequent to passage of the referendum authorizing its construction - continues to surprise me. In my opinion, this divisiveness is fostered by a small but vocal minority with its own agenda; and I would characterize the result as a tyranny of the minority. No one denies that there are several legitimate reasons for some delay of the project or that some citizens have had genuine concerns. Some mistakes have been made by everyone involved in the process to build the new school, but the overall effect of this small minority has been to multiply and lengthen delays, and to exacerbate a distrust of elected officials associated with the project. Most of you who are concerned about the pace of progress of the new school and who live and vote in Killingworth are independents, not affiliated with either party. Nevertheless, regardless of whether or not you belong to the Democratic or Republican Parties within the town, there are occasions during which you can express your opinions on this issue; you do not need to belong to a political party to get involved in local politics. (Of course we Democrats would welcome you to our party should you choose to join one.) In addition to the regular, monthly meetings of the Democratic and Republican Town Committees - each of which can be instrumental in getting things done in town-you can voice your feelings decrying the lack of progress on the project at the bi-monthly meetings of the Board of Selectmen. These meetings take place on the second and fourth Mondays of every month in the Town Hall. You can call the Town Hall to confirm meeting dates and times. The meetings are, of course, open to the public and a ticket of admission is not required. The Building Committee of the RSD 17 Board of Education also holds regular, open meetings on the second Wednesday of every month in the lower media center of HK High School. During these monthly meetings, residents are invited to hear updates regarding the project's status and to share ideas of what can be done to help move the project along. Both of these gatherings, as well as other regularly held meetings of standing town committees (specific days and times for which are available by calling our Town Hall), provide an opportunity for dialogue and transparency in the town which builds trust and puts rumors to rest. The referendum to construct the school was approved by an overwhelming majority of voters, and in a democratic republic, referendums that receive majorities are enacted. Nevertheless our new intermediate/middle school is now increasingly likely to open in January 2007 rather than in September 2006. That is the case despite its having been approved by more than 25 officials and state and local agencies in addition to a clear plurality of voters. If you are madder than hell and you don't want to take it any more, and if you would like to see the new school built without further delays, then get involved and voice your opinion. March 8, 2005 Recent columns in this space have urged Killingworth residents to contribute their time and talents to the town's commissions, committees and service organizations. Regardless of their party affiliation, (or lack of one,) volunteers share a commitment to act on behalf of all of us to preserve what we value and improve what disappoints us. Many members of the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee are particularly active. Among them are three of the six members of the town's Conservation Commission, which has launched a crucial initiative in association with the University of Connecticut's NEMO program. NEMO - Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials - is an educational program for land use decision makers that addresses the relationship of land use to natural resource protection. It was originally conceived as a pilot project to help local officials in three Connecticut coastal towns ameliorate the impact of nonpoint source pollution (polluted runoff) on the Long Island Sound. Killingworth is a vital watershed that provides clean water to metropolitan New Haven and shoreline communities from Guilford to Old Saybrook. The Conservation Commission was quick to recognize that the NEMO program could assist the Planning and Zoning Board, the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, the Water Pollution Control Authority, the Land Conservation Trust and other influential local groups in a coordinated effort to safeguard our precious and irreplaceable resources. Three NEMO workshops have been held to date. All were well attended. The first, on reducing runoff, focused on the problem of nonpoint pollution and innovative ways Killingworth can avoid or alleviate it through careful planning, zoning, subdivision and site design. Case histories from nearby towns illustrated the success of conservation-oriented regulations and new technologies. The second workshop defined a timely and important town need: conducting a community resource inventory (CRI). The CRI identifies all of a community's natural, social and economic assets. This is an essential first step in achieving the meaningful analysis, relevant planning and effective implementation needed to maintain environmental health. The workshop also introduced participants to a computer software program that enables users to overlay a series of maps to visually depict different aspects of a community's assets. (An excellent example of this technology is available here) The third workshop, which was designed primarily for acting board and commission members on Planning and Zoning, Inland Watercourses and Wetlands and Conservation, discussed the relative merits and drawbacks of allowing fees in lieu of open space. This practice enables towns to request a fee up to a certain amount of a property's fair market value instead of an open space donation for subdivisions. All Killingworth residents are urged to attend the upcoming NEMO workshop on Open Space Planning. This subject is of paramount importance for Killingworth, where critical woodland habitats and a unique rural character are under mounting pressure from development. Originally scheduled for February 21, the Open Space Planning workshop was canceled due to snow and will be rescheduled soon. Ambitious as the NEMO program is, it is only the beginning. Now comes the hard work of undertaking a complete CRI, reviewing land use and other regulations, considering alternative strategies and developing a far-reaching plan for conservation and development. It will require the combined effort of dozens of volunteers serving on numerous committees, commissions and boards. It will lay claim to the time and energies of town officials and consultants. Most of all, its success will depend on the support and involvement of all Killingworth's citizens in shaping our collective future. March 1, 2005 We've established in previous columns that Killingworth needs all of us if it is to be the revitalized rural community we envision. With that in mind, it is time to start thinking about next Fall's candidates for office, Boards and Commissions. It is my opinion that we need new vision and new leadership in this community that cuts across the board. It is time for new people to step forward, learn the ropes, and begin to replace those who have served in the same positions for many years. Because the changing of the guard is inevitable, a large pool of willing and knowledgeable volunteers and candidates is essential to a well-considered future. Revising the Town Charter is a major step in shaping the Killingworth of tomorrow. The Board of Selectmen will be recommending a Charter Revision Committee shortly. It must be a broad committee that includes members of the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee, the Killingworth Republican Town Committee and the unaffiliated or Independents. The Committee may require six months to a year of concentrated effort on a number of areas. The first order of business is to bring town statutes in line with state statutes. The time may have arrived for the serious consideration of a larger Board of Selectmen and a town manager whose sole responsibility would be town business. Another decision to be considered is whether or not Planning and Zoning should be divided into two separate boards. It is certainly time to address the senior/affordable housing issues that are often eluded to but bring forth few concrete solutions. We will not have a real community in the long term if we do not hold unto a multi-generational population. Locations for cluster housing that conform to soil based zoning must be actively sought. On the subject of the much needed athletic fields, I still believe a central location is the best solution. We need to look at a large tract of land where adequate parking could be accommodated. The new Town Hall issue needs to be revisited and a modern, functional building that will serve the needs of the coming decades, planned. In anticipation of playing fields at the Bosco site and the new middle school, I would also urge a proposal that the state look into traffic control needs from the traffic light at Route 148 to the circle at the intersection of Route 80 and 81. I strongly believe the time has come to look at increased funding for our town library. At present, the operational expenses of the Killingworth Library are not fully funded by the town. The Killingworth Library Association has to raise approximately $80,000 a year for some of those expenses. This has made it almost impossible for the Library Board to build the endowment fund. The Library is, in many ways, our town center. If the town, through its political process, chooses not to increase its support to the library, then we have to think of other means to assist the library in raising revenue in order for it to continue the same level of service it offers today. We have much on our plate. Let's all rise to the occasion and thoroughly consider these and the other issues pressing to be addressed. February 22, 2005 The last several years have been filled with momentous political events. National, state and local politics have all laid numerous contentious and divisive issues at our doorstep. We have been forced to earnestly consider those issues and respond with our votes. We hope for the best, yet must consider the worst. It is in such times that the choices we make define us. Inevitably, we learn something about ourselves both individually and collectively. The voter turnout in Killingworth for the last election exemplified our shouldering of responsibility. We showed up in numbers that reflect our consideration of what matters. The numbers also show that our town was divided on national issues. In Killingworth, the election was close. At the other end of the spectrum we cast our ballots on a second referendum on the proposed Killingworth Recreational Complex on the town-acquired Bosco property. The proposal was, as you know, defeated. The surprise here was the large turnout and overwhelming voter rejection of the project. No one anticipated this resounding negative response. The second referendum is not brought up here to rub salt into the wounds of those who supported it. Nor should it be a source of great satisfaction to its opponents. The facts remain salient for us all. We invested valuable time, money and human resources. We needed two referendums to determine the will of the constituencies of our town. It took us nearly three years to decide that this proposal was not the solution to a problem that still remains before us. In retrospect it now seems ill advised from the start. What did we learn? That we hadn't heard from most of you until the final vote. Of Killingworth's 4,596 registered voters approximately 915 are Democrats and 1177 Republicans. Anyone can do the simple arithmetic. The largest political entity in Killingworth is not a political party. It is the unaffiliated voter. Yet this largest political entity in Killingworth does not have an organization. It does not have a committee to head it. It does not have a weekly column in our local newspaper. It issues no statements or press releases. It runs no candidates for First Selectman. Its voice is only heard when our town is confronted with major issues, many of them divisive. Killingworth will continue to face the challenge of defining itself in the coming years. Intelligent planning is essential. Identifying our needs before they become problems is the only way to control growth. In order for that to happen we need the input of all our citizens. In short, we need to understand more about what the constituency of our town deems both important and prudent. The Democratic Party is far and away the minority party in our town. It is our goal to level the playing field. A democracy is supposed to represent all of its citizens. It is with that thought in mind that we hereby urge any and all unaffiliated voters to help us. We hope that party affiliation matters and we are working anew to prove that. We need to hear and understand your opinions. Many unaffiliated voters feel that joining a party means a loss of individuality. However, there is no neat ideological ribbon that binds us all. There is, rather, a belief in a process that ties us all together. We don't agree on every issue. I'm sure many Democrats voted for the recreation complex. I'm sure many voted against it. Our common goal is to find the solution that we believe does the least harm for the most good, for all of Killingworth's citizens. If you are unaffiliated we cordially invite you to become a registered Democrat. A trip to the Town Office Building to fill out a simple form is all it takes. In return you will be able to help formulate the choices offered to us all as we confront the challenges that Killingworth faces today and tomorrow, instead of merely vetoing someone else's idea of a solution. If you're not ready to join us officially we welcome you to join us as a visitor at one of our monthly meetings and make your viewpoints known. We want to hear from you, no matter what. We want to know who you are. We want to know what you want. We want you to help make it happen. Killingworth needs us all. February 9, 2005 The time has come, yet again, for all good people to come to the aid of their country -- the country town that is Killingworth! More than 6200 people occupy Killingworth's 36 square miles. Defining and addressing the individual and collective concerns of our citizens requires more than 169 official positions -- more if subcommittees are considered. Including the Board of Education, there are approximately 42 elected officials. The remaining consist of appointed officials or members of boards, commissions, agencies, authorities, and study groups. The opportunities seem endless: justice of the peace, Town Charter committee, land use, municipal agents to the aging, planning and zoning, etc. There are many public ways in which our citizens contribute to our community. For instance, there are more than sixty volunteers with the Fire Company and more than twenty volunteers and attendants with the ambulance association. There's the Killingworth Women's Organization and the Lions Club, the Land Trust and the sports' coaches, the Trails' Group and the church groups, the library volunteers and the PTO, and the town's political parties, to name just a few. The volunteerism in our community is impressive. Yet, my purpose in this particular article is to suggest that you consider participating in official town roles. Of the more than 4300 registered voters, approximately 4% at any given time is needed to fill Killingworth's official town roles. But who? Many of our residents have fulfilled their "calling" to public life through decades of service - people like Lou Annino, Sr., Rick Albrecht, and Pamela Ahearn. It is also common, given the lack of folks standing in line for openings, for some to simultaneously occupy various posts. People like Hilary Kumnick and Linda Dudek come to mind. How did they start? For some, the family legacy left no alternative but civic participation. For others, a simple inquiry or comment at a meeting opened the door for an invitation to participate. I hope this article serves to open the door for you. Although some of our residents simply do not currently have time to dedicate, others presume that someone else will do it - the "they" I keep hearing about but have yet to meet. Still others may be interested but are hesitant to volunteer or step forward because of a perceived lack of relevant expertise or knowledge of how to get involved. If you want to participate, there are at least three ways to get into the pipeline. The first and easiest is to attend the relevant meeting. Each month, the Killingworth Chamber of Commerce's Krier and the Killingworth Today website publish the meeting schedule for many, though not all, of these town committees ranging from Board of Finance to Pay as You Throw. All official meetings are also posted at the Town Hall and are open to the public. The second avenue is to communicate with the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee chair, Michael Sanders, or a member of the Nominations Committee. The KDTC is notified of vacancies and maintains a list of people interested should openings arise. The political parties make recommendations to the Board of Selectmen for committee appointments and also support appropriate candidates for town elections. Both parties often search high and low to find people willing to dedicate time. I believe that the respective political parties would be eager to learn of your interest in being considered for current or future openings in a variety of roles. Third, to be considered for appointment, you can also discuss your particular or general interest directly with the First Selectman. You can help shape Killingworth's policies and future. If you have ideas, interests, energy, and/or expertise, you can be part of the solution. You don't have to be a maven. If you are simply interested, willing to listen and learn, and able to dedicate time and energy, the town needs you! The KDTC Nominations Committee is currently in the process of accepting names for consideration for the Democratic slate in the 2005 municipal elections and for a standing list for future openings on appointed town boards and commissions. Feel free to contact the Killingworth Democratic Town Committee at P.O. Box 752, Killingworth, for more information. February 1, 2005 There is an understanding in democratic societies that a contract exists between the citizen and his or her government. We acknowledge that a certain degree of freedom is given up by each to insure the common good of all. As the amount of wealth produced by invention and production in the twentieth century grew, the concept of the common good broadened. In most western nations it now includes a minimum of financial security and basic health care. Part of our particular minimum financial security grew out of the most desperate economic times of the past century. The Great Depression of the 1930s left working and middle class Americans adrift in a grim reality of steep unemployment statistics and low wages. Without unemployment or health insurance, without protection for widows and orphans, without pensions for the elderly, houses and belongings were repossessed. Many people lost any semblance of independence as generations moved in with one another and breadlines grew across the land. In the midst of those dark times, Franklin Delano Roosevelt stepped up to the plate with a "New Deal". It was to be woven into our mutual contract, and a significant part of it was the Social Security Program so many rely on today. Defending the program in 1935, FDR told the nation "..it has been increasingly difficult for individuals to build their own security, government must now step in and help them lay the foundation stones." He championed the case for unemployment insurance and Social Security because he saw the need to give the average citizen a straightforward measure of minimal financial protection. It was to be a protection that drastic swings in either the economy or political ideology could not undermine. To rally the spirit of what was then a very somber nation, FDR proclaimed loud and clear that we had "nothing to fear but fear itself." How ironic that fear is now being used in an attempt to dismantle the heart of these "foundation stones." And it is being attempted at the same time good paying jobs are being exported by corporations. Many of these corporations are also downgrading or eliminating their own pension plans. It is being attempted in spite of outrageous public cases of accounting and investment fraud, corporate greed, and growing corporate influence over government policy. Knowledgeable men and women from both sides of the political aisle are denying the existence of a Social Security "crisis". The Congressional Budget Office and members of the Social Security Administration do not see an imminent crisis. Most agree that some minor adjustments are needed for future years, adjustments not unlike those that have been made in the past. A well-informed public will accept necessary changes that are argued for openly, in an atmosphere conducive to finding real solutions to real problems. The rallying cry for an "ownership society" seems to leave out the mechanisms already in place for Americans to buy into corporate America through IRAs and 401ks. Millions of workers have been using both for decades now to enhance their retirements. It gives them the flexibility of putting more savings away in better years and less in leaner ones. At the same time, the payroll tax ensures the worker a basic safety net contributed to continually by him or herself along with his or her employer. The "foundation stones" remain in place. The concept of an "ownership society" as one in which everyone jumps into the stock market is pretty narrow. Social Security is not a free lunch; workers contribute to it. They own a part of it just as they own a part of the social contract that brings Americans together as a nation. For the common good, we agreed in 1935, under FDR, to a safety net for all of us. We Americans pride ourselves on problem solving. There is nothing so wrong with Social Security that some honest Yankee ingenuity can't fix. The process must be an open one; the facts presented in a clear, straightforward manner; the debate, public and civil. This is far too important an issue to be handled within any framework that resembles "politics as usual." (The Killingworth Democratic Town Committee dedicates today's column to the memory of John MacVean Lally. His presence will be missed at our table.) January 18, 2005 What a privilege to have been elected your State Senator. Regardless of our differences, I want to acknowledge and thank Bill Aniskovich for his many years of service. Over the course of the year, I will be reporting to you concerning events in our state government, particularly as those events affect this Senate District comprised of the towns of Killingworth, Madison, Guilford, Branford, North Branford, and Durham. In all that I do, I will seek to motivate and effect positive change. I will not "go along to get along." Before we get into the 2005 session of the General Assembly, I must share with you the experiences of the recent political campaign. By Connecticut and national standards, we started the campaign a bit late, and so Patty Ann and I and our growing group of campaign staff and volunteers worked intensely for f |
Return to top